STOP DROP & ROLL
December 1, 2009

Going to see them on Thursday, and I fully expect this show to blow my mind.

But, second nerdier thought: played through my excellent Grado SR-225 headphones (which, I shall note, I scored slightly-used at a 75% markdown - I don’t spend $300 on headphones), the soundstaging is fucking ballistic. Even with how highly compressed the sound must be through YouTube’s lossy encoding. The percussion rings, and I mean that in a good way.

November 29, 2009
Karol:
in other news -
world's most inclusive nation, the Swiss, have voted against minarets
the world remains shocked
me:
yeah i saw that
sigh
they had to do it DURING the haj, didnt they
Karol:
oh I fell the whole motion is stupid
me:
well no shit
Karol:
but even more stupid is all the media that find this surprising
me:
i should ask some of my swiss friends about this
well, coverage of switzerland in the states is somewhere between nil and cough drops
Karol:
this is all over Poland now
me:
yup and canada too, but the gym plays cnn and not cbc for some reason i cannot comprehend
Karol:
what I'm wondering
is how weird must their construction law must be to even be able to ban something like that in a public vote
me:
meh
honestly, where there's a wacko, there's a way
Karol:
you think?
me:
eventually this law will probably be found unconstitutional i'd imagine
Karol:
nope
the whole idea is to change the constitution
me:
oh for sure. honestly, one thing that's impressed on me lately is that the economy doesn't matter, the laws don't matter, nothing matters except group dynamics.
sometimes one of the two becomes group dynamics.
Karol:
Strasbourg /might/ interfere
but then Strasbourg's jurisdiction over Switzerland is not so strong as in EU proper
me:
no, strasbourg wont dare making switzerland retreat from the eu
Karol:
I believe your concept of what matters might be biased
me:
nou
Karol:
Switzerland's not in the EU
that's the problem
me:
i agree
thats what i mean
Karol:
it's in EEA and Schengen
but yeah
economy matters
laws matter
me:
sure they do
group dynamics matter more
perceptions and shit
Karol:
group dynamics matter when media tell you they do
me:
very true!
Karol:
yeah
me:
i do not disagree with that statement
Karol:
except at some point you define your reality by the media
and then you have people saying our previous government was like a communist regime
me:
i disagree
Karol:
no it's true storu
me:
the media is one part of your reality
Karol:
*story
me:
an important part but not the entirety
Karol:
exactry, one part
me:
my point is, there is a way to break or subvert any system.
because any system requires the will of its constituent actors to put together.
where there is a desire to stop a system from functioning in a given way, that desire will manifest itself.
also, you can s/system/part of a system/ if you so please
Karol:
you are too vague
me:
fine. organizational system
of people
me:
free societies, free markets, liberty and justice and all that stuff, it all exists as long as the people in power want it to exist. in a republic, the people in power are theoretically put there by the electorate. where the electorate does not put an emphasis on any of these wonderful abstractions, cf. russia, those abstractions start to go away.
Karol:
well that's pretty obvious
still can't see where you're going with this though
me:
fine. so what i'm saying is, when apparently 61% of the electorate wants to ban a certain group of people from practicing in a certain way? sure, there are right now limits to what they can do to limit muslims and muslim practice. but i'd be willing to bet that those barriers are on their way out, as long as there's no group of people (internally) who wants to stop them.
Karol:
yeah well that's democracy
me:
not just in democracy.
even outside of democracy i would argue that societies tend to resemble the people who constitute them.
Karol:
well true
no system can exist without support
me:
there was a certain polish socialist character and there is now a polish democractic-republic character, and they likely are not so different, except that this one is probably a lot "nicer" than the old one.
Karol:
all forms of autocracies and dictatorships have at least some, if not overwhelming popular support
me:
i am not saying support. i am saying resemblance
aggregate resemblance
Karol:
hm I'm not sure the polish argument stands
me:
well, look, canada was only under martial law in 1970, and i wasn't here for that part
Karol:
because socialism hasn't historically been something ours
it lasted for so long mainly due to external factors
me:
thats a good point actually. it was not a polish organizational system
Karol:
ie. military intervention from the USSR
although you are actually right about the current system not being necessarily that much different from the previous one
me:
well, new institutions tend to come from old ones.
Karol:
(you are now using arguments of the polish right-wing, BTW)
me:
then we shall both acknowledge that i am not part of the polish right wing, and you will allow me to use these arguments toward different goals than the polish right wing is likely to
Karol:
the socialism here was a direct result of Postdam and Yalta
and the marginalization of the influence of the polish gov't in exile in London etc.
but that's another story
November 25, 2009

/*To fix a bug under IE that cause some of the menu element to be cut:
Also add html>body so that IE6 doesn't read this instruction because
the text was cut at the top*/

html>body #menu ul ul li a .threeLines div div{
margin-top:-12px;
}

Holy god. To fix a display bug on a bad display platform, we are writing a ridiculous selector and then assigning it an illegal property. I am bowled over.

November 21, 2009
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

This song reminds me of Weezer, more than a little bit. Crazy simple, but the crazy beerhall chorus gives me chills!

November 19, 2009

I own one of the relevant macs, but I can’t even get it on the Internet. Forget Ethernet — it doesn’t have a modem.

November 12, 2009
La mémoire numérique crée un panopticon temporel, dans lequel nous devons prendre en compte le fait que non seulement nous sommes observés, mais que les générations futures pourront observer ce que nous sommes en train de faire. Avec pour résultat éventuel, un état terrible d’autocensure, un désengagement des affaires publiques, la peur que ces informations numériques soient brandies contre nous dix ans plus tard, lorsqu’on cherchera un emploi ou demandera un prêt bancaire…
Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, professor of public policy, in an interview in Libération. I’ve been talking about the Internet as a panopticon for years…
November 5, 2009

Here’s the Macleans article about how much of a shitshow Montreal is. Though, I’m not sure it’s all that much better anywhere else. And, to be honest, you could write this kind of screed about just about anywhere.

Who comes up with these kinds of logos? In fact, why does the H1N1 pandemic have a logo? It’s not like people need to be sold it or reminded of it.

Who comes up with these kinds of logos? In fact, why does the H1N1 pandemic have a logo? It’s not like people need to be sold it or reminded of it.

November 1, 2009
Aucun parti, aucun chef n’a donné l’impression de pouvoir fournir à Montréal le leadership dont elle a désespérément besoin. … Lors des élections municipales de 2001 et de 2005, La Presse a accordé son appui à Gérald Tremblay. Depuis, le maire s’est dévoué à sa ville. … Louise Harel n’a pas su offrir une vision claire pour l’avenir de la métropole. … L’aptitude de Mme Harel à manier le balai est devenue beaucoup plus incertaine à la suite des révélations faites au sujet du comportement de Benoit Labonté, son bras droit jusqu’à il y a quelques jours. … Est-il nécessaire que le maire de Montréal parle anglais? Non… mais presque. … À nos yeux, Louise Harel ne satisfait pas aux exigences du poste. … Certains volets de la personnalité de M. Bergeron sont trop inquiétants pour qu’on lui confie la mairie.
André Pratte, chief editorialist of La Presse. Via Fagstein.
October 31, 2009

There’s a famous New Yorker cover cartoon describing how New Yorkers see the world: toward the bottom of the page, closest to the viewer in perspective, there’s the Hudson, then a little bit farther back New Jersey and then, the dreaded “flyover country,” inside of which Chicago is a poor stranded island of something.

In my life here in Montreal, at least, the New Yorker is wrong. Because at least here in Montreal, there isn’t Flyover Country; maybe we’re too far away from the Prairies, or the interminable farms of the Midwest. There’s the farmland of eastern Ontario, of course, and the soybeans and corn around the Monteregian mountains, but this isn’t stuff you see from up high. No one flies from Montreal to Toronto or Quebec, so it’s more of an interminable, six-hour daze from here to anywhere else, not the sort of thing you can minimize.

And the cities? They’re signposts, tags, name-description. The people I know are all city dwellers, but on the vast sheet of North America, we’re the exception to the rule. We’re lucky enough to be from this corner of this continent, where you can walk down the street to buy detergent, and we bump into people every day. It’s easy for us to indulge ourselves into thinking that Boston is the city full of ‘bros’ and New Yorkers are less well dressed than Montrealers, but who are we kidding? Montreal or Pierrefonds, Boston or Brookline, New York or Scarsdale, Toronto or Markham, whatever! This is North America, the largest, most homogeneous part of the world that has ever existed, a place where six hours is a short drive, a place where differences in culture express themselves in gradients and not borders.

Urban-dwelling North Americans, from this part of the continent, act flippantly when it comes to cities. (I’m no exception; last weekend I dropped everything to rideshare off to a fanciful weekend in Toronto.) We talk in terms of local culture in a way that I’ve never heard Spaniards or French people talk, despite the fact that Lille and Bordeaux are dramatically more different than Ottawa and Boston. And I wonder if it’s not just because we’re on the defencive.